Bielfeldt v. KPMG LLP
KPMG advised Bielfeldt to report his taxes as a trader in securities without considering the possibility of reporting as a dealer. Reporting as a trader caused Bielfeldt to report and pay tax on far more income than he actually earned. After KPMG finally advised Bielfeldt to file amended returns as a dealer, the IRS refused to give tax refunds to Bielfeldt because, among other things, Bielfeldt's returns had been prepared by KPMG.
The trial court granted KPMG's motion for summary judgment before trial. Bielfeldt appealed and the appellate court reversed the summary judgment and returned the case to the trial court.
The case was tried to a jury in the summer of 2008, and the jury returned a verdict in Bielfeldt's favor for $17.6 million. KPMG's appeal is pending in the appellate court.

